Woodpigeons’ and wild-birds’ migration-decision-making abiotic factor : evidence based data concerning Air Pressure increasing monitored for 24 years of 152 peaks/waves in autumn in Italy and Europe

Enrico Cavina *

• Club Italiano del Colombaccio – ecavinaster@gmail,com

Key-words : Woodpigeon,wild birds,mass migration,Air Pressure, peaks/waves ,evidence based,references

Abstract

Seasonal migratory peaks are represented as the most important and exhaustive expression of the migratory impulse of migratory birds, impulse itself subject to the determinism of biotic and abiotic factors connected to each other in terms of sensitive migratory ecology.(32,33,34,12bis)
In 24 years – almost a quarter of a century – we have been able ( Club Italiano del Colombaccio) to extract 152 events of migratory peaks of the Columba palumbus species in Europe and more directly on-the-field in Italy.
By linking these migratory data ( milions of recorded birds )(48,52,53,82,31 ) with highly qualified meteorological data in detail (HistoricaArchives)(77,78,79,80,36,84), and selecting from among all the abiotic factors(85,91) those of Atmospheric Pressure (a strictly physical element in the context of the habitat of life of birds, such as atmospheric air) we obtain the following evidence: the increasing A.P. value more than 10 hPa – as most important abiotic factor of the migration take-off timing ‘s decision making- has been evidenced in 94,44% of Peaks/Waves , 12-48 hours before the take-offs .(36,40,44,73)

The sensitive response that occurs simultaneously in thousands of wood pigeons (and in other avian species) that leave massively for migration, cannot fail to have an organ and / or integrated body sensory system dedicated to receiving this physical stimulus (increase in atmospheric pressure) and at the present time the only supposed organ can only be Vitali’s Para-tympanic Organ (PTO).
The analysis – and its results recorded on 152 events over 24 years -wants to draw the attention of Research Institutions so that they can develop studies and insights on PTO still totally lacking after more than a century from the discovery of the PTO.
The analysis – and its results recorded on 152 events over 24 years –

INTRODUCTION

Bird migrations remain a fascinating and still mysterious phenomenon of Nature closely linked to the evolution of animal species on planet Earth itself materially evolved (continental drift) and evolving (climate change). Despite the immense interest in study that it arouses, a sense organ (PTO) (38,39,73,12,12bis) identified for more than a century (1911) (1,73)is not yet sufficiently studied and, more particularly, no research has been developed linking it as the supposed “biological barometer / altimeter ” to the sensitive-migratory ecology of wild birds (94). Occasional references are found in Literature, but specific data-base analyzes and documents are still totally lacking as for wild birds.

Our retroactive research contributions ( 73,35,36,40,48,52 and Italian Journal Woodpigeon Research -https://journal.ilcolombaccio.it/ , INDEX)-always carried out in terms of Citizen Science have tried invain to attract the attention and initiatives of institutional researchers (Ornithology, Ecology, Molecular Biology, Anatomy,Natural Sciences, etc.).
With reference to a single migratory species (Columba palumbus) we have been able to develop a migration forecasting method (75,76) by linking the weather forecast (atmospheric pressure increases) and seasonal timing of migration on the territories of origin and transit with forecast reliability results above 90. %, especially with a focus on transit areas of origin (Falsterbo Sweden) and stop-overs ( Italy- personal experience on the field) and in this case with video highlights of mass take-offs of hundreds of thousands of Wood Pigeons, all at the same forecasted time at scheduled times.(75,76)
All our predictions were right and most impressive result (2017) is

https://youtu.be/pGK6z9SY8Cg (*****)

(if Link results not efficient copy/pasate on Youtube search)

Other mass-take-off on from Mesola forest documented by video 6 November 2020 ,after an Air Pressure jump ( 18 hPa) from high stable Air Pressure condition from 1012 hPa to 1030 hPa in 48h.

The value of predictions of results in scientific research is confirmed in Literature. (72)

Certainly more probative are the selective analyzes obtained with real-time monitoring from observation and visual counting “in the 500 m visual field” recorded in experienced in migration for over 20 years (Citizen Science – Italian Journal Woodpigeon Research), and at the same time extraction – with study license – of data collected by institutions (Falsterbo – GIFS) in crucial monitoring points in Sweden and France (Pyrenees): analysis focus on “mass take-off and transit, peaks and waves” as maximum expressions of the migratory impulse of the Columba palumbus species.
The result is therefore “evidence based data” and “evidence based events” in Europe (52) in multiannual collecti
Materials and Method.

All the personal References (2014-2022) (73)and the Italian Club del Colombaccio (1997-2022) ( constitute the consolidated basis of details on the identification and analysis of “mass take-offs, peaks, waves” and on the evolution of detection and monitoring methods. .(31,50,82)
All the extraction of meteorological (85,91) and climatological data (81,84) then connected to the dating of the migratory events were carried out by the Historical Archives of specific established Websites, which can be checked online. (77,78,79,80,84)

Table 1

AIR PRESSURE increasing ( + hPa .max) 12-48 h before the take-off of the Peak/Wave )Italy

YEAR number of events +hPa/12-48h before

1998 one 15 hPa
1999 two 20 -10
2000 one 10
2001 one 15
2002 one 10
2003 one 22
2004 one not-available
2005 one 11
2006 two 10-22
2007 one 10
2008 two 10-11
2009 two 11-13
2010 one 15
2011 two 15-10
2012 one 20
2013 two 10-12
2014 one 14
2015 one 11
2016 two 11-10
2017 two 11-12
2018 two negative
2019 two 11-10
2020 two 11-negative
2021 two 11-16

TABLE 1 – The present list is over 24 years ‘ monitoring of autumn migration of Woodpigeons ( Columba palumbus) crossing Italian Peninsula and collected 37 selected peaks/waves ,corresponding to the the periods of the most intense migration in Italy which are highlighted in specific references (73,35,36,40,48,52 and Italian Journal Woodpigeon Research -https://journal.ilcolombaccio.it/ , INDEX.). For each migration peak / wave the correspondence of the atmospheric pressure increase values detected in precise qualified websites with detailed historical archive (references 77,78,79.80,84) was assessed. The statistical approach is for 23 years (one year 2004 – onepeak- is without meteo-data available) and 36 peaks: 34 have evidence of increased Air Pressure happened 12-48 h before the take-off from the origin / transit area ( mostly Istria Croatia and Adriatic coast Italy) .The data (1998-2007)are fully documented and supported by detailed GRAPHICS (temperature,Air Pressure,Wind force,Wind direction on Weather Archives no more available after 2008 )reported in Monograph “Autumn Migration of Woodpigeons in Italy” Ed.Aracne,Rome,2018 from pag . 128 to pag.135.(36 ).All the selected events (days/years) are according specific seasonal periods-timing identified and reported in References ( 73,35,36,40,48,52 and Italian Journal Woodpigeon Research -https://journal.ilcolombaccio.it/ , INDEX)-
The increasing A.P. value more than 10 hPa – as most important abiotic factor of the migration take-off timing ‘s decision making- has been evidenced in 94,44% of high Peaks/Waves (*)
(*)We define ( 35 ) ( from The General Pattern of Seasonal Dynamics of The Autumn Migration of The Wood Pigeon Columba PalumbusinItaly.(35)Availablefrom: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328336987_The_General_Pattern_of_Seasonal_Dynamics_of_The_Autumn_Migration_of_The_Wood_Pigeon_Columba_Palumbus_in_Italy ) the term peak day as a day within which the number of obser-ved birds exceeds 5% of the individuals observed within the season (all birds observedfrom the beginning to the end of the observation period = 100%). This means that ifduring a period of two, three or more consecutive days the share of birds each day isabove 5% of the total number of observed birds, all these days will be called ‘peakdays’. For a more precise description, peak days with different values are designatedas ‘low peaks’ – 5.1-10.0% of the yearly total, ‘moderate peaks’ – 10.1-15.0% and‘high peaks’ – >15%. Still the term ‘peak’ refers to one day. When we use the per-centage value of the share of the day in the entire study, calculation of the SimilarityIndex (SI – discussed below) is natural and easily understandable.We use the term wave of migration to refer to a period of several days in sequencein which the migration is more intensive than in periods with lower numbers(shares). The wave can contain both peak days and days with very low numbers.Within the entire period of seasonal migration, waves are usually smaller at the be-ginning and at the end of migration period than in the middle period of migration,and of course the probability that real peak days will occur then is lower.To study whether two curves representing migration dynamics are similar or dis-similar in terms of the course of migration, we can use statistical tools, such as chi-square or similarity indices.

In our first detailed analysis (1997- 2014) our summary was as follows

“In this detailed paper we have tried to detect all the possible abiotic data on three areas of transit of woodpigeons (Columba palumbus) on autumn migration (Falsterbo Sweden – French Pyrenees – I Appennine mountains and valleys of Iatly), processing and reporting of their date..
Our focus was to identify the main abiotic factor related to the weather that can be defined as the proximate cause or “finger-pressing-the-button” for the take-off flights of the autumn migration from nesting areas near both transit areas. The analysis was conducted on census data in transit, in the Archives of various institutions. The total quantity of birds counted in migration over 40 years (from 1973 to 2014 ) was 42,936,667. Over the past 15 years (1999-2013) 47 peak days-of- mgration were identified in Sweden, 42 peaks in the Pyrenees and 12 in Italy, i.e. 101 peaks in total. These peaks were compared with the weather conditions recorded day by day and hour by hour and detailed in the Archives of Weather History. The analysis carried out mainly with data rates of incidence of abiotic factors has revealed that the most likely finger-pressing-the-button can be identified as rising of the atmospheric pressure at all three sits (92.62% Sweden, 92.85% in the Pyrenees and 91,00% in Italy). Variations above 10 hPa in 75.80% of the peaks for the sector “36/24 h” and 76.19% for the sector “18 h” preceding the take-off. The global analysis of all the abiotic factors makes it possible to construct a Numbers of hypotheses for the interpretation of the “why” this happens. The sensory input which detects these variations of atmospheric pressure is identified as the Para-Tympanic Organ of Vitali, a possible “biological” barometer.

,.”In our second actual analysis ( 2015 -2021) we can report the following update concerning events and relative increase in atmospheric pressure 12-24-48 hours before:

Falsterbo ( Sweden – transit’s site close to the origin areas)
• 2015(2 events) +17,+12 hPa
• 2016(3 events) +14,+28,+11
• 2017(4 events) +17,+13,+48,one negative
• 2018(1 event) + 15
• 2019(3 events) +23,+13,+19
• 2020 ( 2 events ) +15 ,+18
• 2021 no special events (diluted migration flow without notable peaks)

Italy transit monitoring along Italian peninsula far to origin area)

-2015 ( 1 event) +11 hPa
-2016 ( 2 events) + 11 ,(+7)
-2017( 2 events) +11,+12
-2018 (2 events) negative,negative
-2019( 2 events) +11,+10
-2020 ( 3 events) + 12,+22,+10
-2021 ( 3 events ) one negative ,+ 12 , + 15 ( mass take-off)

Total events recorded/selected for the present update 7 years ( 2015.2021) : 25/29 increasing more than 10 hPa 12-48h before
Falsterbo 14/15 – 93,33%
Italy 11/ 14 – 78,57 %
. From 1999 until today we can report the following update of a total of 89 events
Falsterbo Sweden total 63 events peaks /waves
Italy 26
In this update we have excluded the findings from France (Pyrenees) due to the reduction of registration sites in the last years

Concerning the “increasing” of the atmospheric pressure ( more than 10 hPa) we have in the first analysis ( 1999-2013) positive 92.62% Sweden, 92.85% and 91,00% in Italy and the present update (1998-2021) 94, 44%.
We must strongly underline that the present data ,reported as a synthesis ,are documented in details in precedent papers published on-line year by year ( references from 35 to 53 and updated 73 )

In addition to these documentary data it seems useful to report
a special focus “ Mass movements”

The phenomena of takeoff “strip” of thousands and thousands of pigeons has been observed at many migration seasons : “ Strips” or “Tapes “ are long ( more than 500-1000 meters/Kms) groups of Woodpigeons agglomerated in a unique or slightly fragmented mass- as a “cylinder” in the sky- in a long sequence of big flocks or unique flock flittering in a virtual corridor ( probably isobaric) of the atmosphere (95),usually at quite important altitude ( more of 500 m. over the ground or sea ) always oriented on a well identified migration’line ( from north-east to south-west or from east to west) .
To have better reported events of “ strips” we have a special list about the observations on the eastern site of Appenine mountains/hills ( Monte della Chioda- by Raffaele Faccin) :
• 17 October 2012 (h.9,28) “Monte della Chioda” ( check Googlearth) – 3km in 4 minutes continuing transit – +10hPa increase
• 18 October 2012 (h.9,08) as a “target” by continuing transit for 11 minutes on the same valley – +22 hPa increase
• 17 October 2019 (h.9,30) transit 3 minutes – + 10 hPa
• 26 October 2019 ( h.9,23) large 3/4 km x long 7/8 km , 5 great flocks in sequence in 9 minutes + 10 hPa
• 10 November 2019 ,same area Romagna ,sequence of 50 flocks ( size 2000-5000)
• 10 November 2019 , in Massa Fiscaglia (FE) a single “cylinder” of flocks in sequence for 30 minutes ( from Mesola forest take-off) +10
Many of these events have been documented with videos and pictures

The basic atmospheric conditions in the areas of origin (mainly stop-overs) are difficult to catalog in detail in a global analysis of the area and its timing, but in particular and occasional observation conditions they can offer interesting elements aimed at interpreting – or how much less trying to interpret. – the behavior of populations in stop-over before deciding on migratory take-off. Even a single event – casual in multicentre documentary observation in a large stop-over area – can offer elements of analysis and discussion :
• 26 October 2019 ( h.9,23) large 3/4 km x long 7/8 km , 5 great flocks observed in Monte Chioda ( Central Appenine on the Flyway from Adriatic coast Mesola-Ravenna ) in sequence in 9 minutes and increasing Air Pressure + 10 hPa ,24h before in the stop-over origin take-off .

On 25 October 2019, preceding this observation of movement and mass transit in the stop-over area (88,89)directly connected to the Monte Chioda area, a singular behavior of large flocks (1000-10.000-30-000 birds) was detected in pasture on agricultural areas adjacent to the Mesola forest (Ferrara, Italy). In the early afternoon (h15.30-16) in distant pasture sites (1-20 km), in the absence of any disturbing factor and in full contemporaneity these flocks took off and continued vaulting over the site in bands of altitude 100-300 m from the ground. The phenomenon – which occurred simultaneously in distant areas – occurred in calm wind, temperatures 19-20 °, humidity 70-80, Atmospheric pressure slightly increased from 1017 hPa to 1020 hPa (previous 24h from 1014 hPa) – The phenomenon thus in simultaneous action was observed by expert hunters and documented on video (D. Bianchi – personal communication). Even if a single event has no scientific value, it can still be a starting point for interpretation: the wood pigeons in stop-over and in the feeding phase, sensing (94) the increase in atmospheric pressure, got up as if to test the isobaric conditions in altimetric corridors such as to guarantee a subsequent-after 12 h- migratory flight with energy saving and atmospheric stability free of turbulence

Another particular phenomenon and event – also repeated in various seasons – is that of the occurrence of the extreme migratory impulse simultaneously on populations of Wood pigeons with origins thousands of kilometers away from each other and in the presence of substantial photoperiod differences (latitude, longitude) and of geo-orographic characteristics.

It happened recently to the day of 24 October 2021 – characterized by a large isobaric situation (https://www.ilcolombaccio.it/CMS/una-giornata-straordinaria/ Map) with an imposing large nucleus of very high atmospheric pressure ( 1021-1030 hPa from Scandinavia,East Europe,North Central Europe,Mediterranean area,West Europe) and on this basis ( forecasted jump of Air Pressure 10-18 hPa 24.48 h before 24 October ) the mass migration is expected well in advance – but in the geographical whole of Europe it offers the singular CONTEMPORANEITY of peaks or events documented in 4 geographic sites enormously distant from each other (Sweden, Eastern France, Pyrenees, Italy) : different origins, opens – in our opinion – questions that are worth trying to investigate. An interpretative hypothesis can be ventured: even on different genetic bases and different geographical conditions, a single “physical” abiotic factor (generalized increase spread over the whole continent and stable in atmospheric pressure) can trigger the migratory impulse over the whole West Paleartic.

We must note a particular aspect concerning the so-called pre-nuptial or spring migration with departures from the wintering quarters to the nesting areas. Our present work is based on documented detailed data obtained by hunter-detectors during the autumn migration when hunting is allowed in Italy. During the spring hunting is forbidden and therefore we only have occasional signs which are however significant.
In recent years, however, we have collected (2022)evidence of large masses from Sardinia( wintering area) and the Adriatic coast( transit area) coinciding with the atmospheric pressure rises 12-48h before the events. mass occurred in Sardeggna after an elevation of 10-15 hPa (and subsequent stabilization at 1030-1035 hPa) detected in the Cagliari airport archive 12-72 h before migration-observation as by https://www.ilcolombaccio.it/bacheca/index.php/topic,4522.0.html

More in addition to the present item “ wild birds” we have collected data on other avian species as in
https://photos.google.com/share/AF1QipM79yvIsGsLOiiwU_wuU3evW2-Kpqk1jTfMZwQ6dw6zRUS44mmb0S2dA2uCXPn5Ag?key=QXFxeDMzVUV0WTcxbnNlRG43RlJhYjJOcXlRbnh3
and link Reference (….) abstract : On the basis of the preceding paper (Cavina, 2014) concerning Eurasian Woodpigeons’ autumn migration, we analyzed abiotic factors on the origin Scandinavian-Russian breeding areas for four more bird species in addition to the Woodpigeon. We have selected 60 migratory mass peaks of transit of the Eurasian Siskin, the Chaffinch/Brambling, the Common Starling, the Common Woodpigeon and the Barnacle Goose. The detailed relationship between mass take-off and changes in Atmospheric Pressure (plus other abiotic factors ) 48-12 hours before starting has been analyzed .
– (A) – 6 peaks not significant
– (B) – 6 peaks moderately significant ( 7-10 hPa difference)
– (C) – 48 peaks strongly significant ( 10 – 20 hPa difference)

Discussion – Conclusion
The aim of the present paper is to offer documented data concerning the interaction between “ increasing of Air Pressure “ ( main abiotic factor) and “ migration decision-making-mass-take-off” in wild birds (93.94) considering the possible role of PTO (73,86,88,89) .

Our data repeatedly published online (2014-2022 References ) are based on direct observation of the migration in the field (1950-2022) and on detailed analysis of the findings in the online institutional literature and Archives on-line.
If it is true that scientific findings acquire veracity if verifiable and repeatable, our attempt at a scientific message falls within these principles and adds another element “predictable and confirmed data” .
Concerning the “Organ of flight “ (73) we underline again that it is basic to say : “PTO is used daily by enormous number of living animals (200-300 billions of birds ) but represents currently one of the major unsolved mysteries and challenges in sensory physiology of vertebrates “ ( Giannessi F.,Ruffoli R., von Bartheld C.S. – (2013 ) – Giovanni Vitali: Discoverer of the Paratympanic Organ – Ann Anat. 2013 ;195(1) 10 – https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22999077/).

REFERENCES

1) Vitali G. (1911) Di un interessante derivato della prima fessura branchiale nel passero. Anat Anz. 1911;39:219–224.

2) Vitali G. (1912)Di un interessante derivato dell’ectoderma della prima fessura branchiale nel passero. Un organo nervoso di senso nell’orecchio medio degli uccelli. Anat Anz. 1912;40:631–639

3) Vitali G.(1925) Il comportamento dell’organo della prima fessura branchiale (placode epibranchiale) nei Selaci. Monit Zool Ital. 1925;36:122–130.

4) Vitali G.(1915) Sui disturbi funzionali e sulle lesioni istologiche dipendenti della distruzione dell’organo nervoso di senso da me descritto nell’orecchio medio degli Uccelli. Atti dell’Acc Dei Fisiocritici di Siena. 1915a;5 (7):291–302

5) Vitali G.(1924) Il comportamento dell’organo della prima fessura branchiale negli anfibi, nei rettili e nei mammiferi. Ricerche Morfol. 1924;4:191–220.

6) Nomination Database. (1934)Physiology or Medicine. 1934 6 Dec 2011http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/nomination/nomination.php?action=show&showid=1990
7) Ruffini A.(1920) Sull’organo nervoso paratimpanico di G. Vitali od organo del volo degli uccelli. Boll Sci med Soc med-chir Bologna. 1920:141–154.
Archo ital Otol Rhinol Lar. 1920;31:397–413

8) Francesco Giannessi,a,*Riccardo Ruffoli,a and Christopher S. von Bartheld – (2013 ) – Giovanni Vitali: Discoverer of the Paratympanic Organ – Ann Anat. 2013 ;195(1): 10
9) von Bartheld C.S.,Giannessi F.- (2011)- The paratympanic organ: a barometer and altimeter in the middle ear of birds?- Exp. Zool. (Mol. Dev. Evol.) 316:402–408, 2011
10) Giannessi F. (1989) On the presence of reciprocal synapses in the paratympanic organ of the chicken. Anat Embryol (Berl) 1989;180:175–178.

11) Giannessi F. (1990)Ultrastructure of the supporting cells of the paratympanic organ in the chicken: a preliminary study. Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper. 1990;66:99–104

12) Giannessi F, Ruffoli R.(1996) The ultrastructure of the sensory hair cells of the paratympanic organ receptor cells in chicken. Anat Embryol. 1996b;193:569–575

12 bis) GIANNESSI F., L. RYSKALIN, R. RUFFOLI – (2017)- Ultrastructural study of the neural microcircuits in the sensory epithelium of the paratympanic organ of the chicken –
Archives Italiennes de Biologie, 155: 64-74, 2017. DOI 10.12871/00039829201712

13) Federici F. (1927) Ueber die Innervation des von Vitali entdeckten Sinnesorgans im Mittelohr der Voegel (sogen. paratympanisches Organ) Anat Anz. 1927;62:241–254.

14) Benjamins CE. (1926).Y a-t-il une relation entre l’organe paratympanique de Vitali et le vol des oiseaux? Arch Neerl Physiol. 1926;11:215–222.

15) Benjamins CE.(1939) L’organe paratympanique de Vitali, soi-disant organe du vol des oiseaux, chez le pingouin. Acta otolar. 1939;27:266–270.

16) Kreithen ML, Keeton WT.(1974) Detection of changes in atmospheric pressure by the homing pigeon,( Columba livia. Journal of comparative physiology volume 89, pages73–82(1974)

17) Giannessi F, Pera L.(1987). On the presence of fibers of probable efferent function in the paratympanic organ in chickens. Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper. 1987;63:337–340

18) Giannessi F, Fattori B, Ruffoli R, Gagliardo A.(1996) Homing experiments on pigeons subjected to bilateral destruction of the paratympanic organ. J Exp Biol. 1996;199:2035–2039.

19) Barry MA, Boord RL.(1984) The spiracular organ of sharks and skates: anatomical evidence indicating a mechanoreceptive role. 1984;226:990–992.

20) Baker CVH, O’Neill P, McCole RB. (2008)Lateral line, otic and epibranchial placodes: developmental and evolutionary links? J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2008;310:370–383.

21) Jaskoll TF, Maderson PFA.(1978) A histological study of the development of the avian middle ear and tympanum. Anat Rec. 1978;190:177–200.

22) Neeser JA, von Bartheld CS. (2002) Comparative anatomy of the paratympanic organ (Vitali organ) in the middle ear of birds and non-avian vertebrates: focus on alligators, parakeets and armadillos. Brain Behav Evol. 2002;60:65–79

23) Petrash EW (1983) , Andres KH, von Düring M, Delius JD. Morphologische Aspekte des Vitali-Organs bei der Taube. Anat Anz. 1983;153:288.

24) Ruffoli R ( 1998), Giambelluca MA, Giannessi F. Ultrastructure of the supporting cells in the paratympanic organ of chicken, Gallus gallus domesticus. J Morphol. 1998;236:65–73.

25) Simonetta A.(1953) L’organo di senso dello spiracolo e l’organo paratimpanico nella sistematica dei vertebrati. Arch Ital Anat Embryol. 1953;58:266–294

26) von Bartheld CS.(1990) Development and innervation of the paratympanic organ (Vitali organ) in chick embryos. Brain Behav Evol. 1990;35:1–15

27) von Bartheld CS.(1994) Functional morphology of the paratympanic organ in the middle ear of birds. Brain Behav Evol. 1994;44:61–73

28) von Bartheld CS, Giannessi F.(2011) The paratympanic organ: a barometer and altimeter in the middle ear of birds? J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2011;316:402–408. [PMC free article]

29) von Bartheld CS, Rubel EW.(1992) Paratympanic and spiracular sense organs: phylogenetic distribution and theories of function, including hearing. In: Webster DB, Fay RR, Popper AN, editors. Evolutionary Biology of Hearing.Springer; New York: 1992. pp. 582–583.

30) O’Neill P.(2009) Molecular mechanisms underlying paratympanic organ development and evolution. RIKEN FY2009 Foreign Postdoctoral Researchers. 2010;22:193–194.

31) Bucchi R.- (2018) – Selective Migration Monitoring (MSM) of Woodpigeons migrated in
Italy https://journal.ilcolombaccio.it/ijwr-vol-1-2018-papers-short-comunications/

32) Martin G. – (2017)- The sensory ecology of birds – Oxford Univ.Press 2017

33) Alerstam T.-(1997)- Bird Migration – Cambridge Univ.Press 1997

34) Newton I.- (2007) – The migration ecology of birds – Elsevier Pub. 2007

35) Cavina E.,Bucchi R.,Busse P. – (2018) – The General Pattern of Seasonal Dynamics of the Autumn Migration of the Wood Pigeon (Columba Palumbus ) in Italy – THE RING 40 (2018) 10.1515/ring-2018-0001and https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328336987 *****

36) Cavina E.(2017) ,Bucchi R.,Bianchi D.,Giovanetti G.,Feligetti V.,Giannerini S.,Bececco L –La Migrazione autunnale del Colombaccio ( Columba palumbus) in Italia –MONOGRAPH pp 1- 288 Ed.Aracne Editrice –Roma – 2017 http.//www.aracneeditrice.it

37) Enrico Cavina, (2017), Denis Bianchi, Vasco Feligetti, Graziano Giovanetti and Rinaldo Bucchi (2017)- Monitoring the 2017 Autumn Migration of the Woodpigeon (Columba palumbus ) : Take-off decision making and forecasting . http://www.scienceheresy.com/ornithologyheresy/Woodpigeons.pdf-https://journal.ilcolombaccio.it/ijwr-vol-1-2018-papers-short-comunications/

38) Cavina E. – (2017)- The Para-Tympanic organ of Vitali : Research’s failure orchallenge ? http://www.scienceheresy.com/ornithologyheresy/VitaliPTO.pdf

39) Cavina E. –(2016)- THE PARA-TYMPANIC ORGAN of VITALI: the challenge of bird sensory physiology . http://www.scienceheresy.com/ornithologyheresy/Cavina2016.pdf

40) Cavina E. –(2014) Decision making of autumn migrations of woodpigeons (Columba palumbus)in Europe: analysis of the abiotic factors-andatmosphericpressurechanges http://www.scienceheresy.com/ornithologyheresy/Cavina2015.pdf *****

41) Cavina E. , Cenni P. –(2017 ) Woodpigeons’ (Columba palumbus ) autumn migration inItaly monitored (consecutive 19 years ) in a single crucial spot by single Observer and uniform method. – Preliminary report (2018) https://journal.ilcolombaccio.it/ijwr-vol-1-2018-papers-short-comunications/

42) Cavina E.,Bucchi R. – (2018 ) – Woodpigeons’ ( Columba palumbus ) autumn in eight migration in Central andNorthern Italy along two flyways monitored ( consecutive 7years ) crucial spots by eight Observers and uniform method .

IJWR – vol. 1 – 2018 PAPERS – Short Comunications

43) Cavina E. (2018 ***** ) -THE PARA-TYMPANIC ORGAN (PTO) of VITALI : a documental * continuing forgotten request to the SCIENCE . Italian Journal Woodpigeon Research 23.11.2018

44) Cavina E. (2018)- CLIMATOLOGICAL CHANGES and MIGRATIONS IJWR – 2.12.2018

45) Bianchi D. (2019)- Le pigeon ramier la côte Adriatique et ses fôrets, migration escale et hivernage au bois de la Mesola . IJWR 2.3.2019

46) Cavina E.(2019)- FLOCKING : preliminary report on the autumn migration 2018 in Italy. IJWR 13.7.2019

47) Cavina E. (2019)- Woodpigeon’s ( Columba palumbus ) autumn 2018 Migration : a particular research on a single “ corridor fly-way ” crossing Central Italy , and focus on “ flocking” , “hunting pressure”, “ IJWR- 23.7.2019

48)- Cavina E. (2020)- Updating Woodpigeon( Columba palumbus) autumn migration’s “peaks/ waves-data” in Europe until 2019 : relationship with a single abiotic factor as Air Pressure’changes. IJWR 19.1.2020

49) Bianchi D. – Migration du pigeon ramier depuis le Delta du Pô jusqu’à la Corse Escale et hivernage au Bois de Mesola année 2019/2020 IJWR 19.3.2020

50) Bucchi R. – Bianchi D. (2020)- M.S.M (Suivi Selectif Migration) ÉTUDE DE LA MIGRATION POST-NUPTIALE 2019 DU PIGEON RAMIER IJWR 26.3.2020

51) Cavina E. & co-Autrhors (2020)- Materials and Methods to study relationships between woodpigeon (Columba palumbus ) autumn migrations’ flight’s heights and meteorological-orographical factors : preliminary report-experience 2019 on a single “crossing site-region”( Liguria) in Italy-IJWR 22.4.2020

52) Cavina E.-Feligetti V. (2021) Woodpigeon’s ( Columba palumbus ) autumn migration in Europe and Italy : critical updating 2020 by live monitoring (MCL) .IJWR 2.2.2021

53) Cavina E.-Feligetti V.(2021) – Woodpigeons’ ( Columba palumbus) migration in autumn 2020: live monitoring (MCL)’s results in Italy – IJWR 8.2.2021

54) Cavina E. (2021)- Citizen scientists meet “Scientific science”-IJWR 18.2.2021

55) Jessica Metcalfe a,b (2013),Kim L. Schmidt a,b,Wayne Bezner Kerr b,Christopher G. Guglielmo a,b,Scott A. MacDougall-Shackleton b,c,*: White-throated sparrows adjust behaviour in response to manipulations of barometric pressure and temperature. Animal Behaviour 86 (2013) 1285e1290

56) Claes Raf (2018) Understanding functioning and evolution of bird middle ear mechanics:a functional morphological analysis-/ Thesis at University of Antwerp, Belgium: 20 December 2018

57) Kreithen ML, Keeton WT (1974) Detection of changes in atmospheric pressure by the homing pigeon,Columba livia. Journal of comparative physiology, 89, 73-82.

58) Hume T. (2020) and co-Authors : Responding to the weather: energy budgeting by a small mammal in the wild . Current Zoology, Volume 66, Issue 1, February 2020, Pages 15–20

59) Jeffrey N. Zeyl1,(2020) Olivier den Ouden, Christine Köpp, Jelle Assink, Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaar, Samantha Patrick and Susana Clusella-Trullas : Infrasonic hearing in birds: a review of audiometry and hypothesized structure–function relationships / Biological Reviews
Volume 95, Issue 4 p. 1036-1054,2020

60) Wildlifewriter Skyscanner (2013) : The weather-awareness of migrating birds / http://thewildlifewriter.blogspot.com/2013/09/skyscanner.html

61) Altshuler Douglas and co-Authors (2015) : The biophysics of bird flight: functional relationships integrate aerodynamics, morphology, kinematics, muscles and sensors /Canadian Journal of Zoology ID cjz-2015 0103./htps://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/bitstream/1807/70313/1/cjz-2015-0103.pdf

62) Melissa S. Bowlin,(2018) David A. Enstrom, Brian J. Murphy, Edward Plaza, Peter Jurich and James Cochran (2015) : Unexplained altitude changes in a migrating thrush /The Auk : Vol. 132, No. 4 (October 2015), pp. 808-816

63) Raf Claes (2018), Pieter GG Muyshondt, Joris JJ Dirckx and Peter Aerts :
Deformation of avian middle ear structures under static pressure loads, and potential regulation mechanisms / ZOOLOGY. 126. p.128-136,2018 /https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/8553866

64) Zeyl Jeffrey N, Ouden (2020) , Olivier den, Koeppl, Christine, Assink, Jelle, Christensen-Dalsgaard, Jakob, Patrick, Samantha C and Clusella-Trullas, Susana (2020)Infrasonic hearing in birds: a review of audiometry and hypothesized structure-function relationships. BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 95 (4). 1036 – 1054.

65) Jun Sato (2019) ,Hideaki Inagaki,Mayu Kusui,Makoto Yokosuka,Takahiro Ushida Lowering barometricpressure induces neuronal activation in the superior vestibular nucleus in mice /PLoS ONE 14(1): e0211297. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211297

66) Sue S. ( 2016) : : VITALI ORGAN https://bybio.wordpress.com/tag/vitali-organ/

67) Scott, Michael G. (2003) “The chiropteran paratympanic organ.” Transactions of the Missouri Academy of Science, vol. 37, 2003, p. 8

68) Duane R. McPherson (2018) : Sensory Hair Cells: An Introduction to Structure and Physiology / Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology, January 3–7, 2018 at San Francisco, California.Symposium

69) Rui Tahara , Hans C. E. Larsson ( 2019 ) : Development of the paratympanic pneumatic system of Japanese quail / Journal of Morphology Volume 280, Issue 10 p. 1492-1529,2019

70) Adrien Michez (2021) , Stéphane Broset, Philippe Lejeune. Ears in the Sky: Potential of Drones for the Bioacoustic Monitoring of Birds and Bats. Drones, MDPI, 2021, ff10.3390/drones5010009ff. ffhal03121147f // https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03121147/document

71)MatiasLauwers(2013)PaulPichler15Nathaniel BernardEdelman1Guenter PaulResch2LyubovUshakova1Marion ClaudiaSalzer1DominikHeyers3MartinSaunders4JeremyShaw4David AnthonyKeays1An Iron-Rich Organelle in the Cuticular Plate of Avian Hair Cells //
Current Biology : Volume 23, Issue 10, 20 May 2013, Pages 924-929

72) Kolosov K. (2019) Predicting research results can mean better science and better advice // https://theconversation.com/predicting-research-results-can-mean-better-science-and-better-advice-125568

References Updated 2022

73) Cavina, E. (2021). The “Organ of flight”: Paratympanic Organ (PTO) of Vitali in Wild Birds as Biological Barometer-Altimeter.- Academia Letters J. Article 1613. https://doi.org/10.20935/AL1613.Open Access — Distributed under CC BY 4.0- https://academia.edu/resource/work/49957294

74) Cataldi G.,Cavina E.,Straser V. (2022) -Reverse Migration of the Wood Pigeons and electromagnetic emissions, before the Mw 3.7 earthquake occurred in Visso-Macerata, Central Italy on October 18,2021- International Journal of Social Relevance & Concern (IJSRC) pagg.24-41 Vol.10(1) – (2022)

75) Cavina E.- Woodpigeon-columba-palumbus-long-term-prediction-2021-of-migration-on-a-climatological-basis-approximation-attempt/- Italian Journal Woodpigeon Research – 21 August 2021 – https://journal.ilcolombaccio.it/

76) J. Scott Armstrong and Kesten C. Green .(2017 )– Forecasting Methods and Principles: Evidence-Based Checklists- https://faculty.wharton.upenn.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/ForecastingMethods-225-Last-Wk-Paper-1312018.pd

77) rp5.ru – Weather for 243 countries of the world – Weather archive at the airports and weather stations – https://rp5.ru

78) Ventusky com. – Weather charts – Archives – http://ventusky.com

79) Wunderground – Weather History & Data Archive | Weather Underground- https://www.google.it/search?q=Weather+archives+history

80) NCDC.NOAA.Gov.
Climate Data Online (CDO) provides free access to NCDC’s archive of global historical weather and climate data in addition to station history information.- https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov › cdo.

81) Judy Shamoun-Baranes (2022) , Silke Bauer2, Jason W. Chapman3, Peter Desmet4, Adriaan M. Dokter5, Andrew Farnsworth5, Hans van Gasteren1,6, Birgen Haest2, Jarmo Koistinen7, Bart Kranstauber1, Felix Liechti2, Tom Mason2, Cecilia Nilsson8, Raphael Nussbaumer2, Baptiste Schmid2, Nadja Weisshaupt7, and Hidde Leijnse9,10 : Meteorological data policies needed to support biodiversity monitoring with weather radar -Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0196.1 (2022)

82 ) Merli F.,Marcucci L. – Progetto Colombaccio Italia : 15 anni di attività -https://www.ilcolombaccio.it/CMS/progetto-colombaccio-italia-15-anni-di-attivita/ (2015)

83) Shamoun-Baranes, J., Liechti, F. & Vansteelant, W.M.G.(2017) Atmospheric conditions create freeways, detours and tailbacks for migrating birds. J Comp Physiol A 203, 509–529 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-017-1181-9

84) Meteociel.fr -https://www.meteociel.fr/modeles/archives/archives.php

85) Sharp, S. P., Mainwaring M. C., Nord, A., eds. (2021). The Impact of Weather on the Behavior and Ecology of Birds. Lausanne: Frontiers Media SA. doi: 10.3389/978-2-88971-869-6

86) Sato J, Inagaki H, Kusui M, Yokosuka M, Ushida T (2019) Lowering barometric pressure induces neuronal activation in the superior vestibular nucleus in mice. PLoS ONE 14(1): e0211297. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211297
Inviato da iPad

87) Boyer AC and MacDougall-Shackleton SA (2020) High Rates of Exposure to Simulated Winter Storm Cues Negatively Affect White-Throated Sparrow (Zonotrichia albicollis) Energy Reserves. Front. Ecol. Evol. 8:222. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2020.00222

88) Carneiro C, Gunnarsson TG and Alves JA (2020) Linking Weather and Phenology to Stopover Dynamics of a Long-Distance Migrant. Front. Ecol. Evol. 8:145. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2020.00145

89) Anderson, A. M., Duijns, S., Smith, P. A., Friis, C., and Nol, E. (2019). Migration distance and body condition influence shorebird migration strategies and stopover decisions during southbound migration. Front. Ecol. Evol. 7:251. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2019.00251

90) Sauve D, Friesen VL and Charmantier A (2021) The Effects of Weather on Avian Growth and Implications for Adaptation to Climate Change. Front. Ecol. Evol. 9:569741. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2021.569741

91) Mainwaring M. C., Nord, A. and Sharp SP (2021) Editorial: The Impact of Weather on the Behavior and Ecology of Birds. Front. Ecol. Evol. 9:777478. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2021.777478

92) Klinner, T., Buddemeier, J., Bairlein, F. et al.(2020) Decision-making in migratory birds at stopover: an interplay of energy stores and feeding conditions. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 74, 10 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-019-2784-7

93)Sébastien Roques, PierreYves Henry, Gaétan Guyot, Bruno Bargain, Emmanuelle Cam, View ORCID ProfileRoger Pradel (2020)- When to depart from a stopover site? Time since arrival matters more than current weather conditions -Ornithology doi: 10.1093/ornithology/ukab057 -https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.02.05.933788v2

94) Elham NOURANI ,Noriyuki M. YAMAGUCHI (2917). The effects of atmospheric currents on the migratory behavior of soaring birds: a review -. Ornithol Sci 16: 5 – 15 (2017)

95) Santos CD, Przybyzin S, Wikelski M, Dechmann DKN (2016) Collective Decision-Making in Homing Pigeons: Larger Flocks Take Longer to Decide but Do Not Make Better Decisions. PLoS ONE 11(2): e0147497. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147497

96) Susanne Åkesson, Giuseppe Bianco – (2017) Route simulations, compass mechanisms and long-distance migration flights in birds
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2017; 203(6): 475–490. Published online 2017 May 12. doi: 10.1007/s00359-017-1171-y